Famous sculpture review system to be introduced

I think each city after the establishment of famous sculpture, can refer to a two-tier system of accreditation, from art, design, culture and community of experts composed of professional accreditation group.
    Since With microblogging, "lying in the gun" events would increase. In distant Xinjiang capital of Urumqi, a large flying flowers heap sculpture and standing in the gun, which looks to become a hot topic of microblogging, and then boarded the newspaper, triggered widespread discussion online, after only three days were removed . The matter so that people know what to do advocate the construction of this sculpture to be too familiar with the "public" powerful.
    Naturally, a lot of people think that the goddess sculpture some ugly, which become the focus of the satire. Aesthetic beauty and ugliness is parroting things, and there is no clear standard, but since this large sculpture stand on a main street, become a public work of art, naturally everyone to suffer the council. In fact, of domestic famous sculpture stereotyped, style obsolete, a silly big empty phenomena has always been a lot of criticism, many voices from the art, design and cultural criticism industry professionals. But rather life during which members of the public, it seems there is no sound, perhaps this how people comfortable and beautiful public space not care about it.
    Even if one the city applauded by the majority of the professions of public sculptures, I think that may also incur the criticism of some of the people should have enough latitude for the people of this aesthetic differences. But the majority of the city's public sculpture does exist repeated old, this is undoubtedly the processes and mechanisms established and famous huge sculpture. As far as I know, the famous sculpture by famous planning, construction and greening management departments in charge of, art experts to participate in the consultation decision-making addition to the introduction of a few cities, most of which are produced as a project tender Qualified Company, there has discretion officials, its aesthetic direction somewhat conservative and tacky, often determines the style of famous sculpture.
    So, what kind of mechanism to make the average quality of famous sculpture has improved? Or, to accept the views of the local cultural experts and the public as a whole, to be more equitable and inclusive aesthetic point of view, at least in the procedure? I think the various cities after the establishment of famous buddha sculpture, can refer to a two-tier system of accreditation, art, design, culture and community of experts composed of professional accreditation group, about 5 finalists selected from the options, online and public The place to publish and solicit county popular vote to select a winner, then tender commissioned production company production, can be installed according to the winner of the design requirements. This procedure can also be reversed, the first public vote finalists will then select the winner of the expert review. I think the use of the Internet and other tools online assessment, vote, etc., the cost should be acceptable.